11/2/2020 0 Comments Samsung Digimax S500
The video camera took 1.8 secs to power up and catch its first picture, which is certainly actually considerably quick, but once it started up, it had taken 2.4 secs between photos without adobe flash and an annoyingly gradual 3.6 secs with adobe flash flipped on.The shutter lag had been a quick 0.5 2nd in high-contrast circumstances and 1.3 seconds in low-contrast illumination.Continuous taking was slow, taking 39 VGA-sized JPEGs in 31.7 seconds for an ordinary of 1.23fps, and 36 5-megapixel JPEGs in 32.9 seconds for an standard of 1.09fps.
The LCD washed out in shiny sunlight, though it had been still feasible to find enough to body our pictures. It obtained up in reduced light simply enough to framework, though not as much as some óf the LCDs wéve observed lately. The adobe flash is ranked to offer even coverage out to about 10 ft with ISO in car mode. Automatic white balance created very comfy, yellowish pictures with our labs tungsten lights, while the tungstén white-balance setting experienced a noticeably bluish toss. Samsung Digimax S500 Manual Setting ProducedThankfully, the manual setting produced neutral results, though the target audience for these surveillance cameras is not very likely to set a regular white balance. Samsung Digimax S500 Series Cams DealGiven that actually Olympuss dirt-chéap FE-series cams deal with to provide a natural white stability in auto mode, we dont realize why it should become so difficult for this camera, although it does so several points that those 0lympus FEs cant even desire of. In natural daylight, the Digimax Beds500s automatic white stability did a great job of neutralizing colors, which were natural-looking and properly saturated. Actually at ISO 50 (the minimum setting achievable with this surveillance camera), some sound was visible in our check images, though it was very small and stayed so at ISO 100. At ISO 200, sound was very noticeable, causing even somewhat dark shades to become mottled with splotches of varying lightness and colors, though several finer information were nevertheless unobscured. By ISO 400, the sound overwhelmed lots of details, resulting in images unfit for printing. Exposures were generally accurate, though pictures were somewhat soft and experienced apparent fringing in highlights, especially with backlit subjects. We furthermore noticed JPEG artifacting, which loaned a choppy appearance to some curved edges. ![]() So, while the Digimax S500 certainly offers a function set that looks good, youre much better off spending a little even more on one óf Samsungs better-pérforming camcorders, or looking at another brand altogether, such as Nikons Coolpix T3. We delete responses that violate our policy, which we encourage you to examine. Discussion threads can be closed at any period at our discernment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |